How do the football public and the coach of Slavia Jindřich Trpišovský evaluate the European performance against Panathinaikos?

Slavia Prague stepped victorious into the third round of the European Conference League. They defeated the Greek big club Panathinaikos at home. In Eden, coach Jindřich Trpišovský’s charges won 2:0 and take a relatively promising result to Greece. Anyway, the promotion is not yet decided.

The match was of course watched by a large number of fans and also by the football public. After the successful performances of Viktoria Plzeň in the Champions League preliminary rounds, the coefficient reins are loaded mainly on the backs of the Sešiovans.

Our last representative in the European Cup (Slovácko) is quite unpopular with these cup matches and, moreover, faces a very tough opponent in the form of Fenerbahce (Slovácko lost the opening match 0:3). With all due respect, the team from Uherské Hradiště is not expected to achieve a significant success on the European field, although it would be useful.

Slavia, on the other hand, has made no secret of the fact that it wants to qualify for the ECL group stage at any cost and so far it has succeeded in its mission.

The Sešivans defeated Panathinaikos Athens 2:0 after goals from Ivan Schranz and Moses Usor. The views of the public and of the coach of Slavia, Jindřich Trpišovský, are generally similar. However, Trpišovský also touched upon the topic of the (non)transfer of Peter Olayinka.

The coach of Slavia evaluated the match as follows, he was relatively satisfied with the result of the match and with the performance of his team. The only thing that bothered him was the unnecessary red card given to Brazilian Santos. At the same time, Trpišovský is well aware that a 2-0 result does not mean anything. His team will have a hell of an atmosphere at the Apostolos Nikolaidis Stadium.

And how did the football public see the opening match of the double-duel between Slavia and Panathinaikos?

SK Slavia Prague, Luděk Mádl, Pavel Jahoda, Jan Podroužek